Personal Injury Lawyer Natioanlly Recognized

We ran across an interesting personal injury case scenario. This would also tie in with landlord and home owner issues. The scenario is as follows:

A landlord owns two homes with 6 bedrooms combined. The landlord rents out each bedroom to separate tenants. The landlord knew that one tenant has a previous history of violence and drug abuse. An incident occurs where the one tenant broke into another tenants room and ended up seriously hurting that tenant. Now how much liability is given to the tenants and home owner?



We dig deep to find the solution to this problem:

We find that a landlord HAS to do mandatory background and criminal checks (this may vary state to state). But as a landlord this is just good practice. You never know who you may be renting to and as a landlord you can at least run the checks to make sure that the people you are bringing into the home are safe.


Now given this doesnt mean that just because the person had prior history that the it is the land lords fault. Every scenario is different and people cannot control other people.



In every situation in every state is different and the only real way to deal with this or to get get real advice would be to contact your local attorney. An attorney who can give you free consultation.

We ran into this forum site called:

www.freeaccidenthelp.info

this is a great forum to join, reason being is they actually have real professional lawyers posting on the page. Any post or threads started are replied with instantly. Go ahead and try it for yourself! just register and see how quickly they respond to any questions or concerns people have.

A+ and 5 Stars FreeAccidentHelp.info Forums!

Whatever problems you may have. We are here to help, even if we cant directly help your situation we can help point you to someone who can. And of course this advice is free


:*

We visited some law forums and we found a great question

“Having read a police report and doctor’s report and so on are hearsay, does it mean no better way to prove the injuries unless a doctor is testified? Does any expert know how to effectively prove the auto personal injuries if the doctor cannot go to the court to be testified?”

one user commented with

“Medical records are not hearsay.
Your attorney should have copies of ALL medical records and doctor’s statements pertaining to the injuries and their treatment. ”

another senior member posted

“You’ll probably get a hearsay objection. If you want the officer to testify about his observations and opinions, have the officer appear and testify.

Note that procedures vary by state and court. Small claims courts are less formal, and you may be able to get away with more; regular trial courts have a lot more formality.”

it is debatable on what course of action is the right course of action. My suggestion would be to contact an attorney that offers free consultations. Fortunately we do know of one. The Law Offices of Ledger & Associates

We found information on Wikipedia was better suited to answer the question and was more reliable then other law books.Our source for the information. (Wiki)

A punch to the face is a personal injury and a battery and a tort

Tort law is a body of law that addresses, and provides remedies for, civil wrongs not arising out of contractual obligations.[1] A person who suffers legal damages may be able to use tort law to receive compensation from someone who is legally responsible, or liable, for those injuries. Generally speaking, tort law defines what constitutes a legal injury and establishes the circumstances under which one person may be held liable for another injury. Torts cover intentional acts and accidents (negligent acts). In contrast to criminal law (in which the offense is against the State and the State is the plaintiff), in tort law, the offense is against a person and that person is the plaintiff.

For instance, Alice throws a ball and accidentally hits Brenda in the eye. Brenda may sue Alice for losses occasioned by the accident (e.g., costs of medical treatment, lost income during time off work, and pain and suffering). Whether or not Brenda wins her suit depends on if she can prove Alice engaged in tortious conduct. Here, Brenda would attempt to prove Alice had a duty and failed to exercise the standard of care which a reasonable person would render in throwing the ball.

One of the main topics of the substance of tort law is determining the standard of care—a legal phrase that means distinguishing between when conduct is or is not tortious. Put another way, the big issue is whether a person suffers the loss from his own injury, or whether it gets transferred to someone else.

Returning to the example above, if Alice threw the ball at Brenda purposely, Brenda could sue for the intentional tort of battery (and the action might also, separately, be a crime against the State). If it was an accident, Brenda must prove negligence. To do this, Brenda must show that her injury was reasonably foreseeable, that Alice owed Brenda a duty of care not to hit her with the ball, and that Alice failed to meet the standard of care required.

In much of the western world, the touchstone of tort liability is negligence. If the injured party cannot prove that the person believed to have caused the injury acted with negligence, at the very least, tort law will not compensate them. Tort law also recognizes intentional torts and strict liability, which apply to defendants who engage in certain actions.

In tort law, injury is defined broadly. Injury does not just mean a physical injury, such as where Brenda was struck by a ball. Injuries in tort law reflect any invasion of any number of individual interests. This includes interests recognized in other areas of law, such as property rights. Actions for nuisance and trespass to land can arise from interfering with rights in real property. Conversion and trespass to chattels can protect interference with movable property. Interests in prospective economic advantages from contracts can also be injured and become the subject of tort actions. A number of situations caused by parties in a contractual relationship may nevertheless be tort rather than contract claims, such as breach of fiduciary duty.

Tort law may also be used to compensate for injuries to a number of other individual interests that are not recognized in property or contract law, and are intangible. This includes an interest in freedom from emotional distress, privacy interests, and reputation. These are protected by a number of torts such as infliction, privacy torts, and defamation. Defamation and privacy torts may, for example, allow a celebrity to sue a newspaper for publishing an untrue and harmful statement about him. Other protected interests include freedom of movement, protected by the intentional tort of false imprisonment.

The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is delict.[2] The law of torts can be categorised as part of the law of obligations, but unlike voluntarily assumed obligations (such as those of contract, or trust), the duties imposed by the law of torts apply to all those subject to the relevant jurisdiction. To behave in ‘tortious’ manner is to harm another body, property, or legal rights, or possibly, to breach a duty owed under statute. One who commits a tortious act is called a tortfeasor.[3] Torts is one of the American Bar Association mandatory first year law school courses.[4]
For more info call 800-300-0001 or visit Personal Injury Lawyers | Attorneys | Wrongful Death | Law | Accident Attorneys | Find an Attorney | California | Orange County



Personal Injury Lawyer Badges

The Law Offices of Ledger & Associates™ is a registered trademarks of Law Offices of Ledger & Associates, P.C.in the United States .Law Offices of Ledger & Associate's™ trademarks may not be used in connection with any product or service that is not Law Offices of Ledger & Associates'™, nor in any manner that is likely to cause confusion among customers, or in any manner that disparages or discredits Law Offices of Ledger & Associates™. All other trademarks not owned by The Law Offices of Ledger & Associates™ or its subsidiaries that appear on this site are the property of their respective owners, who may or may not be affiliated with, connected to, or sponsored by The Law Offices of Ledger & Associates™.
preload preload preload